The United States once again offended the public anger by imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court

US media said that US Secretary of state Pompeo announced sanctions against two officials of the International Criminal Court on September 2 local time. This is the trump administration’s most aggressive move so far, intended to prevent the court from investigating possible war crimes committed by US military and intelligence officials. < p > < p > ponpeo claimed that he had designated fatu Bensouda, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, and fakiso Mochochoko, the head of the jurisdiction, complementarity and Cooperation Department of the International Criminal Court, who “substantially helped Bensouda”, as the targets of sanctions, according to cable day. < / P > < p > he warned at a state Department press conference: “individuals and entities that continue to support those people in substance will also face the risk of sanctions. In addition, the State Department of the United States has restricted the granting of visas to certain persons involved in the ICC investigation of US personnel. ” “These coercive actions against an international judicial body and its civil servants are unprecedented and constitute a serious attack on the court, the international criminal justice system under the Rome Statute and the rule of law in a broad sense,” the International Criminal Court said in a statement In a separate statement, Quan Wukun, President of the assembly of States parties to the International Criminal Court, refused to accept the sanctions, saying: “they will only weaken our common efforts to combat impunity for mass atrocities.” “We stand together with the court and its staff, as well as the partners who exercise the judicial authority of the court,” Quan said. The court will soon meet to consider the measures imposed by the United States and take action to give the court unlimited support. ” < / P > < p > the Dutch foreign minister, stef bullock, tweeted that he was “disappointed” by the US action against the court in the Hague. < / P > < p > he said that the Netherlands “will continue to support the International Criminal Court in carrying out its functions independently and in fighting against impunity. We will explore with our EU partners how best to support the court. “. < / P > < p > according to the executive order signed by him, any “individual who directly participates in the investigation, arrest, detention or prosecution of American personnel by the international criminal court without the permission of the United States” or who takes the same measures against his personnel without the permission of American allies can be punished. < / P > < p > the report points out that a few months ago, the International Criminal Court authorized an investigation into the alleged war crimes committed by us and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, as well as the alleged war crimes and acts committed. Prior to that, Bensouda also urged the investigation of possible Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people. < / P > < p > reports that trump administration officials have consistently refused to accept the authority of the International Criminal Court on the grounds that the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute. The trump administration has taken steps to prevent investigations, including the cancellation of Bensouda’s entry visa last year. < p > < p > in June this year, White House press secretary Kelly mcnaney said in a statement: “the action of the International Criminal Court is an attack on the rights of the American people and a threat to our sovereignty.” “As stated in the executive order signed by the president, the United States will continue to take all necessary measures to protect our citizens and allies from unfair prosecution by the International Criminal Court,” she said